Donkey milk research · Study 186
Residues and contaminants in donkey milk: what has been measured so far
This review from Serbia assesses about 100 papers on chemical residues in donkey milk. Aflatoxin M1 was not found or only in traces in most studies, and in the only feeding trial 0.02% passed from feed into milk; for lead, 11% of samples in an Italian study were above the EU maximum level of 0.02 mg/kg. The authors found no published data on veterinary drug residues in donkey milk.
At a glance · swipe or use the arrows
The key figures
Study design
How it was studied
Literature review by the Scientific Veterinary Institute “Novi Sad” (Serbia). According to the methods section, about 100 papers from Scopus, MDPI, Taylor and Francis, PubMed, Wiley, Springer and Web of Science, published 1995–2024, were assessed, with studies from China, Croatia, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Italy, Romania, Serbia and Turkey. For four groups of substances – heavy metals, aflatoxin M1, organochlorine pesticides and PCBs, and residues of antibiotics and antiparasitics – the paper describes routes of entry, regulatory framework (EU, Codex Alimentarius, Serbia, China, USA), published values in donkey milk, preventive measures and analytical methods. There are no own measurements; inclusion and exclusion criteria or an assessment of study quality are not described. The full text including all tables was assessed.
Interactive chart · values from the study
Heavy metals in donkey milk from three Italian regions (means)
Source: Table 2 of the review (cited study, Sicily, Calabria, Emilia-Romagna, ICP-MS). For comparison: EU maximum level for lead in raw milk 20 µg/kg (0.02 mg/kg).
Second analysis
Aflatoxin M1 in donkey milk: samples and detections per study
Source: Table 3 of the review. Feeding trial: detection after deliberate administration of contaminated feed. Northern Italy: 1 sample between limit of detection and limit of quantification. Percentages from the table converted to sample numbers.
Results
What the study measured
Heavy metals: according to the authors, the EU maximum level for lead in raw milk of 0.02 mg/kg applies to donkey milk. In a study of 45 samples from Sicily, Calabria and Emilia-Romagna, mean lead was 13.88 µg/kg; 11% of samples exceeded the maximum level (20% on one farm, 7% on the other two). In 112 samples from Martina Franca jennies in Reggio Emilia, lead averaged 3.2 µg/kg, and in 17 samples from Turkey it was below the limit of detection; 19.59–48.2 µg/kg lead are reported from Romania.
Aflatoxin M1: the mould toxin was detected in 5 of 9 studies, including a feeding trial with deliberately contaminated maize. The other detections ranged from 0.003 to 0.035 µg/kg; the EU maximum level for raw milk is 0.05 µg/kg. No aflatoxin M1 was found in studies with 84, 90 and 70 samples.
Carry-over from feed: in the only feeding trial, six jennies received maize containing 202 µg aflatoxin B1 and 11 µg B2 over 12 days; carry-over into milk was 0.02%. The authors explain the low values by grazing, low casein content and digestion as non-ruminants.
Pesticides and PCBs: according to the review there are only two papers from Italy (45 and 55 samples). Indicator PCBs and p,p’-DDE were typical; values in the older study were mostly below legal maximum levels, while in the more recent one non-dioxin-like PCBs ranged from 1.26 to 872.00 ng/g fat. Jennies that exclusively grazed had higher values than those receiving mixed feed.
Veterinary drugs: the authors found no published data on antibiotic or antiparasitic residues in donkey milk. In the USA donkeys are classed as a “minor species”, and drug doses are usually derived from horses; ivermectin is not intended for lactating jennies because neither a withdrawal period nor a maximum residue limit has been set.
Prevention: the authors recommend good agricultural, manufacturing and veterinary practice, feed testing, HACCP concepts and specific limits and monitoring programmes for donkey milk.
Authors’ conclusion: Heavy metals, aflatoxin M1, organochlorine compounds, PCBs and veterinary drug residues are a potential food safety hazard for donkey milk; research, monitoring and binding standards need to be expanded. The review shows how scarce the data are – it allows no general statement on how contaminated donkey milk is overall.
Critical appraisal
Strengths and limitations
Few, small studiesClear limitation
There are two papers on pesticides and PCBs and none on veterinary drugs. Several aflatoxin studies include only 5 or 6 samples.
Regionally limited dataNote
The values come mainly from Italy and south-eastern Europe. Feed, environment and husbandry differ from region to region.
No systematic methodologyNote
The databases are named, but selection criteria and an assessment of study quality are not.
Risks partly derived from other speciesNote
The authors themselves stress that comparisons with cows are speculative because donkeys, as non-ruminants, absorb substances differently.
Complete tables with limitsStrength
The review sets measured values, sample numbers and applicable maximum levels side by side and openly names gaps.
Editorial note: A useful inventory of what is known about chemical residues in donkey milk – and above all what is not. The findings are mixed: aflatoxin M1 mostly not detected or only in traces, individual samples above maximum levels for lead and PCBs. For producers, this mainly means checking feed, water and the grazing environment and having batches analysed. To the research archive.
Research question for DON DONKEY’S®
How do lead, cadmium and aflatoxin M1 in batches from our partner farms compare with EU maximum levels – and do grazing and housing periods differ?
Original publication
Chemical contaminants in donkey milk: A review of literature on sources, routes and pathways of contamination, regulatory framework, health risks, and preventive measures.
Original title: Chemical contaminants in donkey milk: A review of literature on sources, routes and pathways of contamination, regulatory framework, health risks, and preventive measures.
Ljubojević Pelić D., Lazić S., Živkov Baloš M.
Heliyon · 2024 · 10(21), e39999
Scientific Veterinary Institute “Novi Sad”, Novi Sad, Serbia (according to the paper)
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39999
Transparency: funded by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia (PROTECTDonkey project on the protection of domestic donkeys in the Zasavica nature reserve) and the Serbian Ministry of Science. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. No product-related statement for DON DONKEY’S®.
Summarised and checked by the DON DONKEY’S editorial team against the original publication · As of: November 2026
The study summarised above was carried out independently of DON DONKEY’S® and does not relate to our products. It serves solely to inform about the state of research.
DON DONKEY’S® donkey milk and donkey milk powder are foods. They are not intended to prevent, treat or cure any disease and do not replace medical advice.

From our shop
DON DONKEY’S® donkey milk
100 % donkey milk · raw milk, frozen
On this page we report the findings of a published study. Independently of that, you will find our donkey milk here: 100 % donkey milk, frozen as raw milk.
100 ml bottle / 100ml · Unit price: €249,00 / 1 l · incl. VAT, plus shipping

Also in our shop
Donkey Milk Powder
Donkey milk in powder form
For anyone who prefers a longer shelf life: our donkey milk in powder form – easy to store and portion.
20g · Unit price: €1.245,00 / 1 kg · incl. VAT, plus shipping
Buyer protection