Research on donkey milk · Study 36

Donkey milk fractions in a cell experiment

In 2009, Mao et al. separated donkey milk into components in the laboratory and tested how these act on a human lung tumour cell line (A549) and on mouse immune cells.

Important: Isolated milk components were studied on cell cultures. The results cannot be transferred to humans. Donkey milk is not a means of preventing or treating cancer and does not replace medical treatment.
Publication
Mao et al.
2009 · Int. Dairy Journal
Study type
Cell experiment
in the laboratory (in vitro)
Material
separated components
of donkey milk
Cells
A549 cell line and
mouse spleen cells

What it's about

Milk in its individual parts

Instead of whole milk, a research team from China examined individual fractions – groups of components separated in the laboratory according to properties such as molecular size.

The researchers applied these fractions to A549 cells, a cell line from human lung tumour tissue widely used in basic research. Viability, cell cycle and cell death were measured.

In a second approach, they tested whether mouse immune cells release messengers after contact with the most active fraction, which in turn act on the cells.

What exactly was studied?

MaterialFractions from donkey milk
CellsA549 cell line, mouse spleen cells
MeasuredViability, cell cycle, cell death
Immune cellsreleased messengers
ResultFraction IV most active
LimitationCell culture, not humans

Briefly explained

The terms used in this study

Laboratory methodFraction

A part of the milk separated in the laboratory according to certain properties – here, among other things, by molecular size.

Cell lineA549

A cell line from human lung tumour tissue that has been used for laboratory experiments for decades.

Cell divisionCell cycle

The sequence of phases (G0/G1, S, G2/M) that a cell goes through until it divides.

EnzymeLysozyme

A protein that occurs in donkey milk in comparatively high amounts.

Step 01Separating

Donkey milk was broken down into several fractions in the laboratory.

Step 02Testing

The fractions were applied to A549 cells at different concentrations.

Step 03Analysing

Viability, cell cycle and cell death were measured.

Step 04Indirect route

Mouse spleen cells were stimulated with fraction IV, and their culture medium was applied to the cells.

Interactive · The data at a glance

Four fractions, two routes

How was the experiment run, which fraction stood out, what happened in the cell cycle – and what role did immune cells play? Switch between the views.

1FractionatingDonkey milk separated into components in the laboratory
2Direct testFractions on A549 cells, various doses and times
3AnalysisViability, cell cycle, cell death
4Indirect testCulture medium of stimulated spleen cells on A549 cells

Illustration of the findings reported in the abstract of the original publication. Concentrations and measured values are not given there; the graphics are schematic.

Key findings

What the researchers report

Direct route

Fraction IV most active

whey protein · > 10 kDa

The active fractions reduced the viability of the A549 cells depending on dose and time. Fraction IV, a whey protein fraction with larger molecules, had the strongest effect.

Cell cycle

Cells paused

G0/G1 · G2/M · apoptosis

After contact with fraction IV, more cells accumulated in two resting phases of the cell cycle. The authors attribute cell death mainly to apoptosis.

Indirect route

Detour via immune cells

5 messengers ↑

Mouse spleen cells released more messengers after contact with fraction IV. Their culture medium had a stronger effect on the A549 cells than fraction IV alone.

The authors suspect that the high lysozyme content of fraction IV contributes to the findings. The results come from cell cultures and do not allow any statement about the prevention or treatment of cancer in humans.

Critical assessment

Basic research – nothing more

What the study shows

✓
Individual fractions from donkey milk measurably influenced cell cultures.
✓
A whey protein fraction showed the strongest effect.
✓
Mouse immune cells responded with increased release of messengers.
✓
The work provides starting points for further basic research.

What it does not show

×
No effect in humans and no statement on the prevention or treatment of cancer.
×
No statement on drinking donkey milk – isolated components were tested in cell culture.
×
No information in the abstract on concentrations and measured values.
×
Not a substitute for medical treatment.

Research question for DON DONKEY’S®

How much lysozyme is in our milk?

The authors refer to the lysozyme content of the whey protein fraction. For us, this is a prompt to have the lysozyme content of our fresh milk and our powder measured regularly.

01 · ANALYSISHave the lysozyme content of our milk determined.
02 · COMPARISONCompare fresh milk and powder side by side.
03 · OVER TIMEDocument fluctuations over the year.
04 · LITERATUREFollow newer studies on lysozyme in donkey milk.

Original publication

Anti-proliferative and anti-tumour effect of active components in donkey milk on A549 human lung cancer cells

Mao X., Gu J., Sun Y., Xu S., Zhang X., Yang H., Ren F.
International Dairy Journal · 2009 · 19(11):703–708

DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.05.007
Abstract: AGRIS (FAO)

The publication describes cell experiments. It does not allow any product-related statement for DON DONKEY’S® or any statement about cancer in humans.